Voditelji EU zdaj predstavljajo globalno grožnjo<\/span><\/strong>
Elite bloka, ki so ušle nadzoru, ne morejo rešiti težav, zato ustvarjajo nove.<\/strong>

Timofej Bordačov<\/em><\/strong>, programski direktor kluba Valdai<\/em><\/p>

<\/span><\/p>

Keir Starmer Hosts European Leaders For Further Talks On Peace In Ukraine.<\/span><\/em><\/p>

© Getty Images\/Justin Tallis<\/span><\/em><\/p>

Zahodnoevropski politiki so se upravljanja že dolgo lotevali s strategijo izogibanja - vedno so iskali najlažji izhod in odlagali prave odločitve. Včasih je bila to težava le za samo regijo, danes pa njena neodločnost ogroža svetovno stabilnost.

Sedanjo evropsko politično pokrajino je treba razumeti v kontekstu dramatičnih sprememb, ki se dogajajo v Združenih državah Amerike. Politične elite te celine si ne prizadevajo za strateško avtonomijo in se ne pripravljajo na neposreden spopad s svojo največjo državo, Rusijo. Njihova glavna skrb je obdržati oblast. Zgodovina je pokazala, da so elite pri doseganju tega cilja pripravljene storiti marsikaj.

Nedavno je ruski zunanji minister Sergej Lavrov poudaril, da je bila Evropa v zadnjih 500 letih epicenter svetovnih konfliktov ali njihov pobudnik. Danes je njen neodvisni vojaški potencial izčrpan - tako v gospodarskem kot socialnem smislu. Za obnovo bi Evropa potrebovala več let agresivne militarizacije, ki bi osiromašila njene državljane. Zdi se, da so zahodnoevropski voditelji odločeni zagotoviti slednje, vendar na prvo še niso pripravljeni.

Čeprav se države EU morda ne pripravljajo na neposreden vojaški spopad z Rusijo, bi lahko njihova zapletenost v Ukrajino in zanašanje na neuspešno strategijo nepredvidljivo povečala napetosti. Številni zahodnoevropski politiki so svojo kariero stavili na preživetje režima v Kijevu, zaradi česar so pripravljeni sprejeti skrajne ukrepe, da bi upravičili svoje pretekle odločitve. Ta kolektivni politični egoizem se zdaj kaže kot nezmožnost priznati napake ali spremeniti smer.

Znani religiozni filozof je nekoč zapisal, da v kolektivu posameznikov um postane podrejen kolektivnemu interesu in izgubi sposobnost samostojnega delovanja. Ta dinamika je zdaj očitna pri oblikovanju politike EU. Blok je dejansko opustil svoj instinkt za samoohranitev. Ukrajina je dokaz, da lahko tudi velike države vodijo samouničevalno zunanjo politiko. To predstavlja nevarnost ne le za Evropo, ampak tudi za širši svet.<\/p>

Birokratska gniloba v Bruslju<\/strong>
Birokratskega nedelovanja Evropske unije ni mogoče prezreti. Že več kot 15 let se najvišji položaji v EU dodeljujejo na podlagi dveh meril: nesposobnosti in korupcije. Razlog je preprost - po finančni krizi v letih 2009-2013 so države EU izgubile interes za krepitev bloka. Zato Bruselj ne išče več neodvisnih politikov s strateško vizijo. Časi državnikov, kot sta bila Jacques Delors ali celo Romano Prodi, ki sta vsaj razumela pomen pragmatičnih odnosov z Rusijo, so že zdavnaj minili.

Vendar nesposobnost ne izključuje ambicij. Ursula von der Leyen in Kaja Kallas sta zgled za to - voditeljici, ki v domovini nista našli možnosti za napredovanje, zato si zdaj prizadevata, da bi svojo zapuščino ustvarili s konfliktom z Rusijo. Ker v EU nimata prave moči, sta se za utemeljitev svojih stališč oprijeli ukrajinske krize.

Večina retorike o evropskem oboroževanju je le poziranje. Pozivi Bruslja k militarizaciji so namenjeni ustvarjanju medijske pozornosti, ne pa oprijemljivim rezultatom. Vendar ima lahko nenehno spodbujanje vojne dejanske posledice. Javnost v EU je pripravljena sprejeti nižji življenjski standard in večje vojaške izdatke pod pretvezo boja proti „ruski grožnji“. Dejstvo, da ta zgodba pridobiva na veljavi med običajnimi Evropejci, je zaskrbljujoče.<\/p>

Notranja protislovja EU<\/strong>
Voditelji EU so se znašli med dvema nasprotujočima si željama: ohraniti udoben način življenja in hkrati prenesti vse varnostne odgovornosti na ZDA. Hranijo tudi upanje, da bodo s podaljševanjem konflikta v Ukrajini od Washingtona dosegli popuščanje in zmanjšali odvisnost od ZDA. Vendar se s to idejo ukvarjajo predvsem velike države, kot sta Nemčija in Francija. EU kot blok nima prave enotnosti.

Protislovje med nedosegljivimi cilji podžiga predstavo o nedoslednem oblikovanju evropske politike. Začelo se je lani z bizarnimi trditvami Emmanuela Macrona, da je Francija pripravljena poslati vojake v Ukrajino. Od takrat zahodnoevropski politiki proizvajajo neprestani tok protislovnih in absurdnih izjav, od katerih je vsaka bolj nerealna od prejšnje. Politika o ukrajinski krizi se je spremenila v kakofonijo hrupa brez praktične usmeritve.

Edino jasno zahodnoevropsko soglasje je nasprotovanje vsem mirovnim pobudam, ki bi lahko stabilizirale Ukrajino. Vse več predstavnikov EU odkrito vztraja, da se mora vojna nadaljevati v nedogled. Hkrati voditelji večjih držav EU nihajo med bojevitimi grožnjami in priznanji, da bi jo pod ameriškim okriljem le še stopnjevali.

Politična shizofrenija Zahodne Evrope ne vzbuja več pomislekov. Njeni voditelji so desetletja delovali v vakuumu in jih ni skrbelo, kako njihova dejanja dojemajo v tujini. V nasprotju z ZDA, ki včasih delujejo agresivno, da bi pokazale svojo moč, evropski politiki kažejo povsem drugačno patologijo, ki jo zaznamujeta distanciranost in brezbrižnost. Delujejo kot norci, ki se ne ozirajo na zunanje odzive.<\/p>

Trumpova Amerika in evropska dilema<\/strong>
Tako elite EU kot tudi njeno prebivalstvo razumejo, da je pobegniti ameriškemu nadzoru nemogoče. Mnogi si na skrivaj želijo, da bi bilo drugače. Vendar bo novi pristop Donalda Trumpa k čezatlantskim odnosom najverjetneje veliko ostrejši od vsega doslej videnega. Kljub temu se evropske elite oklepajo upanja, da se bodo v nekaj letih na oblast vrnili demokrati in vzpostavili status quo.

Zato je strategija bloka preprosta: čim dlje podaljšati sedanje razmere. Evropski voditelji namreč nimajo pojma, kako bi ohranili svoje položaje, če bi bil mir z Rusijo ponovno vzpostavljen. V zadnjih dveh desetletjih Zahodna Evropa ni uspela rešiti nobenega od svojih perečih problemov. Ukrajinska kriza je le najnevarnejša manifestacija te dolgotrajne disfunkcije.

Politiki EU se še naprej sprašujejo: Kako lahko manevriramo, ne da bi morali resnično ukrepati? Ta pasivni pristop k upravljanju ni več le težava Evrope, temveč aktivno spodbuja konflikte in ogroža svetovno stabilnost.

Ta članek je bil prvič objavljen v časopisu <\/em>Vzglyad<\/em><\/a>, prevedla in uredila pa ga je ekipa RT.<\/em><\/p>

==== Originalni prispevek https:\/\/www.rt.com\/news\/613949-eus-leadership-is-now-global-threat\/<\/a> ====<\/p>

9 Mar, 2025 20:35<\/em>
The EU’s leaders are now a global threat<\/span><\/strong>
The bloc’s out of control elites can’t solve problems, so they keep creating new ones
<\/strong>
By <\/em>Timofey Bordachev<\/em><\/strong>, Programme Director of the Valdai Club<\/em><\/p>

Western European politicians have long approached governance with a strategy of avoidance – always seeking the easiest way out while postponing real decisions. While this used to be a problem only for the region itself, today, its indecision is threatening global stability.

Europe’s current political landscape must be understood in the context of the dramatic shifts taking place in the United States. The continent’s political elites are not striving for strategic autonomy, nor are they preparing for a direct confrontation with its biggest state, Russia. Their primary concern is holding on to power. In pursuit of this goal, history has shown that elites will go to great lengths.

Recently, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov pointed out that, for the past 500 years, Europe has been the epicenter of global conflicts or their instigator. Today, its independent military potential is depleted – both economically and socially. To rebuild, Europe would need years of aggressive militarization, which would impoverish its citizens. Western European leaders seem determined to ensure the latter, but they are not yet ready for the former.

While the EU states may not be preparing for a direct military confrontation with Russia, their entanglement in Ukraine and its reliance on a failing strategy could escalate tensions unpredictably. Many Western European politicians have staked their careers on the survival of the Kiev regime, making them willing to take extreme measures to justify their past decisions. This collective political egoism is now manifesting as an inability to acknowledge mistakes or alter course.

A renowned religious philosopher once wrote that in a collective, the individual mind becomes subservient to the collective interest and loses the ability to act independently. This dynamic is now evident in EU policymaking. The bloc has effectively abandoned its instinct for self-preservation. Ukraine is proof that even large states can adopt self-destructive foreign policies. This poses dangers not just for Europe but for the wider world.<\/p>

The bureaucratic rot in Brussels<\/strong>
The European Union’s bureaucratic dysfunction cannot be ignored. For over 15 years, top EU positions have been assigned based on two criteria: incompetence and corruption. The reason is simple – after the 2009-2013 financial crisis, EU states lost interest in strengthening the bloc. Consequently, Brussels no longer seeks independent-minded politicians with strategic vision. The days of statesmen like Jacques Delors or even Romano Prodi – who at least understood the importance of pragmatic relations with Russia – are long gone.

But incompetence does not preclude ambition. Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas exemplify this – leaders who, finding no avenues for career advancement back home, now seek to carve out their legacy through conflict with Russia. Since they have no real power within the EU, they latch onto the Ukraine crisis to justify their positions.

Much of the rhetoric about European rearmament is little more than posturing. Brussels’ calls for militarization are designed to generate media attention rather than produce tangible results. Yet, constant war-mongering can have real consequences. The EU public is being conditioned to accept lower living standards and increased military spending under the guise of countering the “Russian threat.” The fact that this narrative is gaining traction among ordinary Europeans is a worrying development.<\/p>

The EU’s internal contradictions<\/strong>
EU leaders are now caught between two conflicting desires: maintaining their comfortable way of life while outsourcing all security responsibilities to the US. They also harbor hopes that by prolonging the Ukraine conflict, they can extract concessions from Washington and reduce dependence on the US. But this idea is primarily entertained by major countries like Germany and France. The EU, as a bloc, lacks any real unity.

The contradiction between unattainable goals fuels the spectacle of incoherent European policymaking. It was initiated last year by Emmanuel Macron’s bizarre claims that France was prepared to send troops to Ukraine. Since then, Western European politicians have produced a constant stream of contradictory and absurd statements, each more unrealistic than the last. Policy on the Ukraine crisis has devolved into a cacophony of noise with no practical direction.

The only clear Western European consensus is opposition to any peace initiative that might stabilize Ukraine. More and more EU representatives openly insist that the war must continue indefinitely. At the same time, the leaders of major EU states oscillate between bellicose threats and admissions that they would only escalate under American cover.

Western Europe’s political schizophrenia no longer raises eyebrows. For decades, its leaders have operated in a vacuum, unconcerned about how their actions are perceived abroad. Unlike the US, which sometimes acts aggressively to project strength, European politicians exhibit an entirely different pathology – one marked by detachment and indifference. They act like madmen, oblivious to external reactions.<\/p>

Trump’s America and Europe’s dilemma<\/strong>
The EU’s elites, as well as its populations, understand that escaping American control is impossible. Many secretly wish it were otherwise. However, Donald Trump’s new approach to transatlantic relations is likely to be far harsher than anything seen before. Yet, European elites cling to the hope that, within a few years, the Democrats will return to power and restore the status quo.

The bloc’s strategy, therefore, is simple: prolong the current situation for as long as possible. This is because European leaders have no idea how to maintain their positions if peace with Russia is restored. Over the past two decades, Western Europe has consistently failed to solve any of its pressing problems. The Ukraine crisis is simply the most dangerous manifestation of this longstanding dysfunction.

EU politicians continue to ask themselves: How can we maneuver without having to take real action? This passive approach to governance is no longer just a problem for Europe – it is actively fueling conflicts and endangering global stability.

This article was first published by <\/em>‘Vzglyad’<\/em><\/a> newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team.<\/em><\/p>

==== Konec https:\/\/www.rt.com\/news\/613949-eus-leadership-is-now-global-threat\/<\/a> ====<\/p>

* * *<\/p>

Hiša vedno zmaga: Navidezna „demokracija“ EU se kaže proti romunskemu Georgescuju<\/span><\/strong>
Pod smešno pretvezo so predsedniškemu kandidatu prepovedali udeležbo na volitvah. Ali je to prihodnja usoda celotnega bloka?<\/strong>

<\/span> Tarik Cyril Amar, zgodovinar iz Nemčije, ki dela na univerzi Koç v Istanbulu, se ukvarja z Rusijo, Ukrajino in Vzhodno Evropo, zgodovino druge svetovne vojne, kulturno hladno vojno in politiko spomina<\/em><\/p>

TOREJ, DEMOKRACIJA JE, ČE RAZMIŠLJAŠ KOT MI (JAZ) - ČE PA NE (RAZMIŠLJAŠ KOT MI), POTEM PA ... NIMAŠ PRAVIC!

"DEMOKRACIJA JE SISTEM VLADAVINE V KATEREM JE DRŽAVNA OBLAST V ROKAH LJUDSTVA ALI SPLOŠNEGA PREBIVALSTVA DRŽAVE"